Interconnected risks are often too difficult to spot in the early stages. Multiple recent “black swan” generational events — the Covid-19 pandemic, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — started off as risk “noise,” with little hint of their future impact, ability to trigger other risks, or potential for cascading effects.
It is driven by several factors
The interconnected web of relationships that most — if not all — organizations and nations now possess. Rarely does any entity operate in isolation.
The underlying shared platform connectivity that links us all. There is system-wide interdependence: we need each other to perform the functions of our respective organizations. And technology interdependence: we are linked — by software, system integration, or basic electronic communication — to each other.
The multi-dimensional nature of newer risks — like cyber, supply chain, or extreme weather events — that thrive in an interdependent environment.
Organizations and nations now find themselves increasingly vulnerable to a risk “domino effect.” A single risk, affecting a single company or country, that triggers other risks over time — both within the entity itself and beyond.
Given their complex, multi-dimensional nature, no two risk areas are exactly alike. And exponential risks often fall into one of the below categories.
Definition: A single event triggers multiple secondary risks: Risk1 → Risk2 → Risk3
EXAMPLE The Suez Canal obstruction: A container ship runs aground and unleashes a series of risk events, cutting across multiple areas:
Definition: Two or more risks unexpectedly converge and cause a networked, cascading effect: Risk x Risk
EXAMPLE
Risk#1 →
Cyber: A one-off ransomware attack shuts down a large, cyber-vulnerable grain co-op — causing the operation to go offline.
Risk#2 →
Stretched supply chains: Pressured to maintain high margins, meat producers run lean, just-in-time supply chains — with little redundancy or extra capacity.
Impact →
The halting of grain (animal feed) — a cyber risk with one company — collides with downstream, vulnerable supply chains to create an industry-wide issue with implications for an entire system.
Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has caused both catastrophic local harm and unpredictable shocks to regional and international systems. Price inflation and shortages for food and energy are two examples of exponential risks arising from the conflict.
Prior to the war in Ukraine, Covid-19 and low probability weather events had already caused food price inflation. The conflict has only pushed food prices up further, since Russia and Ukraine are among the largest producers of grains globally, which has added to global inflationary pressures in 2022. Previous increases in the FAO World Food Price Index have correlated with profound social unrest and political instability. 2, 3
Russia has drastically reduced gas flows into Europe, with some pipelines operating at 20% capacity.4 Although most countries are well placed to avoid significant energy rationing, individuals and companies alike would feel the inflationary and negative growth effects of a European gas supply shock. While there are limits, companies that are more diversified geographically or by product, or better able to quickly pass costs through to customers, are better able to preserve their credit quality.
Source 2 Prolonged high inflation would hurt debt affordability, raise social risk – MIS, April 25, 2022 3 MIS Global Trade Monitor – September 2022 4 MIS - Looming gas crisis intensifies credit pressures for Europe’s most exposed sovereigns – August 2022
Unexpected knock-on risks from Russia’s war in Ukraine:
Hurricane Ian in 2022 was one of the costliest catastrophe events in U.S. history with private market insured losses of up to $67 billion.5 Insurance policies in Florida increasingly include a high wind damage deductible and much of the flood damage was not insured at all due to the unprecedented inland reach of high water — so more of the repair costs than ever will fall on individual home and business owners.
Against the backdrop of Covid-19, construction costs have jumped since 2020 with the price of lumber up 240% and steel up 50%. And Assignment of Benefit (AOB) issues are pushing up insurance claim costs by up to 3x — and potentially even 100x if the claim goes straight to litigation. It all adds up to significant financial strain, as a single weather event collides with long-term inflationary trends.
Source 5 Inflationary Trends in Construction Costs and Nat Cat Losses in Recent Events: RMS Whitepaper – May 2022
Insurance claim costs can increase by 100x if they go straight to litigation.
“The compounding effects of the last six years of major hurricanes, the pandemic, supply chain issues, inflation, attritional losses, and post-loss amplification made Hurricane Ian the costliest storm to hit Florida in decades. A combination of high claims volume, additional living expenses related to the massive evacuation efforts, prolonged reconstruction in the worst affected areas, and higher-than-average construction costs will contribute to a significant economic demand surge. We also expect that litigation and assignment of benefits will influence the overall loss severity and lead to complex and lengthy claims settlement processes.”
– Mohsen RahnamaChief Risk Modeling Officer, Moody’s RMS